1. The forums will be archived and moved to a read only mode in about 2 weeks (mid march).

BedRock edition dying

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by rektpixel, Nov 13, 2017.

  1. rektpixel

    rektpixel Baby Zombie

    Messages:
    186
    I haven't been around for a week or 2 bc of school work and in that time I haven't touched bedrock at all. Just before I had a quick look and I'm surprised to see a lot of servers including Vastlands have pretty much completely died off, even the partnered servers aren't doing too well. and BrokenLens has more players than InPVP, I think Mojang should reconsider their decisions regarding partnering and the game itself cuz it seems like a lot of players have run away since the 'Better together update'...:facepalm:

    drop your thoughts!
    edit: quick vid just whipped up. the situation needed it.
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2017
    OnTheVerge, HimbeersaftLP and dktapps like this.
  2. Awzaw

    Awzaw Zombie Pigman Poggit Admin

    Messages:
    726
    GitHub:
    awzaw
    In my estimation players on independent servers have dropped by a factor of about 15... The most likely explanation is the requirement to have an XBL account - many of my players don't even have an email address, and even if they do they have to lie about their age when creating the account to join servers. I can't see them backtracking on XBL, so unless there are massive protests by disgruntled players such as yourself, it's going to be very hard indeed for server owners to stay afloat.
     
  3. QuiverlyRivalry

    QuiverlyRivalry Zombie Pigman

    Messages:
    491
    GitHub:
    quiverlyrivalry
    I agree. Mostly also because of mojangs licence but we have to remember also, that Mojang never wanted mcpe to be free. And the people that used a free version, in the past years. Are salty that they can’t play anymore. But they have to remember they were never allowed to play for free just my thoughts
     
    rektpixel likes this.
  4. Awzaw

    Awzaw Zombie Pigman Poggit Admin

    Messages:
    726
    GitHub:
    awzaw
    They can still find MCPE for free, so I'm not convinced that's the main issue.
     
    iiFlamiinBlaze and rektpixel like this.
  5. QuiverlyRivalry

    QuiverlyRivalry Zombie Pigman

    Messages:
    491
    GitHub:
    quiverlyrivalry
    But can’t connect to servers
     
    rektpixel likes this.
  6. Awzaw

    Awzaw Zombie Pigman Poggit Admin

    Messages:
    726
    GitHub:
    awzaw
    Are you sure about that? I haven't tried myself, but if xbl checks it's a legal client then that'll be a factor too.
     
    jasonwynn10 likes this.
  7. Thunder33345

    Thunder33345 Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    2,137
    GitHub:
    Thunder33345
    i think both of them are part of the causes
     
  8. SteveDev386

    SteveDev386 Silverfish

    Messages:
    17
    GitHub:
    dschwartz783
    Part of the problem is the "featured servers" list. Even if you come up with a killer feature, most people aren't going to be looking for servers to join, if they have 3 "good enough" servers at the top of their server list at all times. Some people still will, but certainly in fewer numbers than before. Staying afloat is going to require a solid command of social media, amazing developers, and good marketing skills, to compete with the Microsoft-approved servers.
     
  9. MK500

    MK500 Slime

    Messages:
    77
    GitHub:
    markkrueg
    It is a very sad situation. The free server I helped maintain for over two years shut down because of the XBL requirement. Every other major change to MCPE/BE over the last 2 years was surmountable; but having every single user convert to XBL login...and then managing moving all their assets from their old login to new was an unsurmountable obstacle for the owners. Even the owner of the server was unable to create his own XBL account because it insisted he must have a cell phone number during the account creation process and he did not have one -- this seems to be a Microsoft requirement in his native country but not all countries.

    Basically millions of young people around the world who used to play online on servers -- but for various reasons are not able to successfully create an XBL account -- are just gone now. It seems like a very sad situation for the community.

    It was a predictable result of Microsofts historic "embrace, extend, extinguish" business model once the purchase of Mojang occurred.

    My prediction: Once they release the fabled official bedrock server -- as alluded to at last years Minecon -- they will begin to make it far more difficult for the PMMP project and other non-MS-servers to function with the official clients. I wouldn't be surprised if the "featured servers" partners are already discussing this with MS under NDA now. And then we will lose a few million more of the community and the journey to closed/proprietary will continue...
     
    rektpixel likes this.
  10. SOFe

    SOFe Administrator Staff Member PMMP Team Poggit Admin

    Messages:
    1,968
    GitHub:
    sof3
    Let's return to the days when you had to install mods to play on the servers. Back then the condition of servers must be worse than this. Why care so much about featured servers? Their popularity is their own business, just as you won't feel unhappy because players are playing other games rather than Minecraft.

    Why so concerned about the number of players? Your server is there always; having no players is emptiness; having a full server is emptiness too.
     
    Last edited: Dec 12, 2017
    jasonwynn10 likes this.
  11. SteveDev386

    SteveDev386 Silverfish

    Messages:
    17
    GitHub:
    dschwartz783
    @SOFe What you said makes no sense, but putting that aside, the primary issue here is that Microsoft, through either ignorance or intent (honestly, it could be either), is making it nearly impossible for 99% of servers to continue. Servers which many of us have put years of work into. As @MK500 said above, I fully expected Microsoft to do something like this, because they're a poorly run company, and tend to go through a "break things" phase, followed by a "fix all your dumb mistakes" phase (Windows ME - Windows XP, Windows Vista - Windows 7, Windows 8 - Windows 10, just to name a few examples), but it's still frustrating, because of all the hard work that's just been wasted.

    There's a sort of "shoot down everyone's arguments" culture here, and it's somewhat annoying. This issue is clearly a concern for all server admins @SOFe. You'd have to be a special kind of person to not be able to at least see that much. Or perhaps you don't run a server, in which case, you may want to try to put yourself in our shoes. It may help you understand us.
     
  12. SOFe

    SOFe Administrator Staff Member PMMP Team Poggit Admin

    Messages:
    1,968
    GitHub:
    sof3
    This has nothing to do with "shoot down everyone's arguments".
    What I'm saying is, let's face the fact. Microsoft is not interested in promoting a community where everyone hosts their own server and there is no centralized control; we know that from day one. And there is nothing we can do about this unless you manage to get half of Minecraft's users to sign a petition against them, which is not possible. To be honest, only this small community of server owners and hackers here is concerned -- Microsoft targets on the "average player", who only wants to play the game in ways it's designed to be like, not to seek a higher level of achievement by "outsmarting" the game. Don't tell me things like behavior packs, partnered servers, etc. aren't intended to displace users from things that the company can have absolutely no control over, such as third-party mods and wild servers.
    When this is a fact that we can't change, the only thing we can do is to adjust our expectations. What I see here is just a full thread analyzing why players are away, and every single reason eventually points to the attitude of the developers. It is totally not constructive creating a thread to complain; it just concentrates the aversion without improving the condition. Why not be more open-minded, adapt to the new situation and find the way out there?
     
    jasonwynn10 and Thunder33345 like this.
  13. SOFe

    SOFe Administrator Staff Member PMMP Team Poggit Admin

    Messages:
    1,968
    GitHub:
    sof3
    This will not increase the total number of players. This only displaces players from certain servers to certain other servers.
     
    jasonwynn10 likes this.
  14. dktapps

    dktapps Administrator Staff Member PMMP Team

    Messages:
    774
    GitHub:
    dktapps
    This is Minecraft players we're talking about, not Bitcoins. There isn't a hard cap.
     
    jasonwynn10 likes this.
  15. SOFe

    SOFe Administrator Staff Member PMMP Team Poggit Admin

    Messages:
    1,968
    GitHub:
    sof3
    I know. What he was saying does not lead to an overall increase, not bringing back players that can't play due to client changes in new updates.
     
  16. SOFe

    SOFe Administrator Staff Member PMMP Team Poggit Admin

    Messages:
    1,968
    GitHub:
    sof3
    But it is being done all the time. This is not something new.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.